Enseñanza con aprendizaje móvil en educación secundaria. Percepción de la comunidad educativa

  1. Ana Isabel Gómez-Vallecillo 1
  2. Diego Vergara Rodríguez 1
  1. 1 Universidad Católica Santa Teresa de Jesús de Ávila
    info

    Universidad Católica Santa Teresa de Jesús de Ávila

    Ávila, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05wa62164

Journal:
Innovaciones educativas

ISSN: 2215-4132

Year of publication: 2021

Issue Title: Tecnologías digitales en procesos educativos

Volume: 23

Issue: 0

Pages: 16-30

Type: Article

DOI: 10.22458/IE.V23IESPECIAL.3514 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Innovaciones educativas

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Este artigo divulga os resultados de uma pesquisa avaliativa de alguns fatores do programa de integração de tablets digitais na sala de aula, a partir das percepções de uma comunidade educacional específica do Ensino Secundário após quatro anos de implementação. Primeiro, os questionários dirigidos a 48 estudantes e 21 famílias são analisados quantitativamente e com um desenho descritivo. Em seguida, qualitativamente, as opiniões de três professores e um membro do Serviço Técnico são descritas em entrevistas semi-estruturadas sobre sua satisfação e a adequação do uso da Tablet como ferramenta educacional. Os resultados destacam a aceitação da comunidade educacional em relação à tablet digital, enquanto identificam alguns dos desafios na implementação do processo ensino-aprendizagem com tablets na educação (informática escolar, competência de ensino relacionada ao ensino e aprendizagem digital, retirada do livro impresso) e concluem que o programa de implementação da tablet tem sido visto como positivo, embora haja espaço para melhorias do ponto de vista da conectividade e da aplicação de um modelo pedagógico cognitivo e colaborativo.

Bibliographic References

  • Allegra, M., Chifari, A. & Ottaviano, S. (2001). ICT to train students towards creative thinking. Educational Technology & Society, 4(2), 48-53.
  • Bausela, E. (2003). Metodología de la investigación evaluativa: modelo CIPP. Revista complutense de educación,14(2), 361-376.
  • Bisquerra, R. (2016) (Coord.). Metodología de la investigación educativa. Madrid, España: Editorial Arco/Libros-La Muralla.
  • Bullock, J. (2001). Evaluating the impact of using ICT upon student motivation and attainment in English. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/32Ce35F
  • Camacho, M. (2017). Tablets en educación. Hacia un aprendizaje basado en competencias. Samsung Smart School 2016-17. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3nbwNCC
  • Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.047
  • Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student motivation: Learning in a mobile age. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1) , 8 2 - 9 6 . h t t p : //d o i :10 .1111/ j c a l .12 0 3 6
  • Dhir, A., Gahwaji, N. M., & Nyman, G. (2013). The Role of the iPad in the Hands of the Learner. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19( 5 ) , 7 0 6 -7 2 7.
  • Fernández, P., Vergara, D., Polo, J., & Fernández, M. L. (2021). Revisión de la implantación del m-learning como método de aprendizaje en España en los niveles educativos de primaria y secundaria. Revista Educativa Hekademos, 30, 60 -71.
  • Fox, A. B., Rosen J., & Crawford M. (2009). Distractions, distractions: does instant messaging affect co-llege students’ performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task? Cyberpsychol. Behav,12(1), 51-3. ht tp://doi: 10.1089/cpb. 2008.0107
  • Fuentes, J. L., Albertos, J. E., & Torrano, F. (2019). Towards the mobile-learning in the school: Analysis of critical factors on the use of tablets in Spanish schools. Education in the Knowledge Society, 20, 1-17.
  • Furió, D., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189 -201.
  • Gómez, R. (2019). Estudio sobre el papel y valor de los contenidos educativos en las aulas. Grupo Análisis e Investigación. Recuperado de http://www.analisiseinvestigacion.com/
  • Gómez-Fernández, N., & Mediavilla, M. (2018). Do information and communication technologies (ICT) improve educational outcomes? Evidence for Spain in PISA 2015. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3n5VCQj
  • Hammer, M., Göllner, R., Scheiter, K., Fauth, B., & Stürmer, K. (2021). For whom do tablets make a di-fference? Examining student profiles and perceptions of instruction with tablets. Computers & Education, 166, 10 4147.
  • Hamzah, W. W., Yusoff, M., Ismail, I., & Yacob, A. (2020). The Behavioural Intentions of Secondary School Students to Use Tablet as a Mobile Learning Device. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(13), 161-171.
  • Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139 -156 .
  • Huffman, W. B., & Hahn, S. (2015). Cognitive Principles in Mobile Learning Applications. Psychology, 6(04), 456-463.
  • Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of Tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Computers in human behavior, 29(3), 525-534.
  • Jiménez-Martín, S., & Vilaplana, C. (2014). Evaluación del Programa Escuela 2.0 a partir de los resulta-dos en Matemáticas de PISA 2012. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3tH8Kh7
  • Kim, K.-J., & Frick, T. W. (2011). Changes in student motivation during online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 1-2 3 .
  • Kowalski, S. E., Kowalski, F. V., & Gardner, T. Q. (2009). Lessons learned when gathering real-time for-mative assessment in the university classroom using tablet PCs. In 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1-5.
  • Kraut, R. (Ed.). (2013). Policy guidelines for mobile learning. Unesco.
  • Lai, F., Luo, R., Zhang, L., Huang, X. & Rozelle, S. (2015). Does computer-assisted learning improve lear-ning outcomes? Evidence from a randomized experiment in migrant schools in Beijing. Economics of Education Review, 47, 34-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.03.005
  • Lee, J., Lin, L., & Robertson, T. (2012). The impact of media multitasking on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 37, 94 -104. ht tp://doi:10.1080/17439884. 2010. 53766 4
  • Mateo, J. (2000). La investigación educativa, su práctica y otras metáforas. Barcelona, España: ICE-UB/Horsori.
  • Meyer, B. (2016). Mobile devices and spatial enactments of learning: IPads in lower secondary schools. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile Learning, 3-10. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3aw28dV
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.h t t p s : //d o i :10 .1111/ j .14 6 7- 9 6 2 0 . 2 0 0 6 . 0 0 6 8 4 . x .
  • Moreira, F., Ferreira, M. J., Santos, C. P., & Durão, N. (2017). Evolution and use of mobile devices in hig-her education: A case study in Portuguese higher education institutions between 2009/2010 and 2014/2015. Telematics and Informatics, 34 (6), 838-852. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.010
  • Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological science, 25( 6 ) , 115 9 -116 8 .
  • Nguyen, L., Barton, S. M., & Nguyen, L. T. (2015). iPads in higher education-Hype and hope. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 190-203. http://doi:10.1111/bjet.12137
  • OECD (2015), Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en
  • Saccol, A., Barbosa, J. I. V., Schlemmer, E., & Rienhard, N. (2010). Corporate m-learning: applications and challenges. In Guy (Ed.) Mobile Learning: Pilot Projects and Initiatives (pp. 215-242). California, USA: Information Science Press.
  • Sandín, M. P. (2003). Investigación cualitativa en educación. Fundamentos y tradiciones. Madrid, España: McGraw Hill.
  • Seif, J. (2019). Mobile Technologies and Mobile Learning: How has the use of tablets innovated learning within Secondary School classrooms? Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2019. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3tDpVAk
  • Sha, L., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., Seow, P., & Wong, L. H. (2012). Recognizing and measuring self-regulated learning in a mobile learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 718-728.
  • Suárez-Guerrero, C., Lloret-Catalá, C., & Mengual-Andrés, S. (2016). Percepción docente sobre la trans-formación digital del aula a través de tabletas: un estudio en el contexto español. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 24(49), 81-89.
  • Torrecillas-Lacave, T., Vázquez-Barrio, T., & Monteagudo-Barandalla, L. (2017). Percepción de los padres sobre el empoderamiento digital de las familias en hogares hiperconectados. El profesional de la información (EPI), 26(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.ene.10
  • West, M. (2012). Activando el aprendizaje móvil: Temas globales. Serie de documentos de trabajo de la UNESCO sobre el aprendizaje móvil. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3tHxWnM
  • Wheeler, S., Waite, S. & Bromfield, C. (2002). Promoting creative thinking through the use of ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18( 3 ) , 3 6 7.
  • Yáñez-Luna, J. & Arias-Oliva, M. (2018). M-learning: aceptación tecnológica de dispositivos móviles en la formación online. Tecnología, ciencia y educación, 10, 13 -3 4 .
Data source: Dialnet