Enseñanza con aprendizaje móvil en educación secundaria. Percepción de la comunidad educativa

  1. Ana Isabel Gómez-Vallecillo 1
  2. Diego Vergara Rodríguez 1
  1. 1 Universidad Católica Santa Teresa de Jesús de Ávila
    info

    Universidad Católica Santa Teresa de Jesús de Ávila

    Ávila, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05wa62164

Journal:
Innovaciones educativas

ISSN: 2215-4132

Year of publication: 2021

Issue Title: Tecnologías digitales en procesos educativos

Volume: 23

Issue: 0

Pages: 16-30

Type: Article

DOI: 10.22458/IE.V23IESPECIAL.3514 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Innovaciones educativas

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

This article disseminates the results of an evaluative investigation of some aspects of the digital tablet integration program in the classroom, based on the perceptions of a specific secondary education community after four years of implementation. First, the questionnaires addressed to 48 students and 21 families are analyzed quantitatively and with a descriptive design. Then, in a qualitative way, the opinions of three teachers and a member of the Technical Service are described through semi-structured interviews regarding their satisfaction and the suitability of using the tablet as an educational tool. The findings show the acceptance of the educational community towards the digital tablet, while identifying some of the challenges when implementing the teaching-learning process with tablets in education (school computer technology, competition teacher related to digital teaching and learning, paper book withdrawal). It is concluded that the tablet implementation program has been perceived as positive, although there is room for improvement from the point of view of connectivity and the application of a cognitive and collaborative pedagogical model

Bibliographic References

  • Allegra, M., Chifari, A. & Ottaviano, S. (2001). ICT to train students towards creative thinking. Educational Technology & Society, 4(2), 48-53.
  • Bausela, E. (2003). Metodología de la investigación evaluativa: modelo CIPP. Revista complutense de educación,14(2), 361-376.
  • Bisquerra, R. (2016) (Coord.). Metodología de la investigación educativa. Madrid, España: Editorial Arco/Libros-La Muralla.
  • Bullock, J. (2001). Evaluating the impact of using ICT upon student motivation and attainment in English. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/32Ce35F
  • Camacho, M. (2017). Tablets en educación. Hacia un aprendizaje basado en competencias. Samsung Smart School 2016-17. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3nbwNCC
  • Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.047
  • Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student motivation: Learning in a mobile age. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1) , 8 2 - 9 6 . h t t p : //d o i :10 .1111/ j c a l .12 0 3 6
  • Dhir, A., Gahwaji, N. M., & Nyman, G. (2013). The Role of the iPad in the Hands of the Learner. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19( 5 ) , 7 0 6 -7 2 7.
  • Fernández, P., Vergara, D., Polo, J., & Fernández, M. L. (2021). Revisión de la implantación del m-learning como método de aprendizaje en España en los niveles educativos de primaria y secundaria. Revista Educativa Hekademos, 30, 60 -71.
  • Fox, A. B., Rosen J., & Crawford M. (2009). Distractions, distractions: does instant messaging affect co-llege students’ performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task? Cyberpsychol. Behav,12(1), 51-3. ht tp://doi: 10.1089/cpb. 2008.0107
  • Fuentes, J. L., Albertos, J. E., & Torrano, F. (2019). Towards the mobile-learning in the school: Analysis of critical factors on the use of tablets in Spanish schools. Education in the Knowledge Society, 20, 1-17.
  • Furió, D., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189 -201.
  • Gómez, R. (2019). Estudio sobre el papel y valor de los contenidos educativos en las aulas. Grupo Análisis e Investigación. Recuperado de http://www.analisiseinvestigacion.com/
  • Gómez-Fernández, N., & Mediavilla, M. (2018). Do information and communication technologies (ICT) improve educational outcomes? Evidence for Spain in PISA 2015. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3n5VCQj
  • Hammer, M., Göllner, R., Scheiter, K., Fauth, B., & Stürmer, K. (2021). For whom do tablets make a di-fference? Examining student profiles and perceptions of instruction with tablets. Computers & Education, 166, 10 4147.
  • Hamzah, W. W., Yusoff, M., Ismail, I., & Yacob, A. (2020). The Behavioural Intentions of Secondary School Students to Use Tablet as a Mobile Learning Device. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(13), 161-171.
  • Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139 -156 .
  • Huffman, W. B., & Hahn, S. (2015). Cognitive Principles in Mobile Learning Applications. Psychology, 6(04), 456-463.
  • Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of Tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Computers in human behavior, 29(3), 525-534.
  • Jiménez-Martín, S., & Vilaplana, C. (2014). Evaluación del Programa Escuela 2.0 a partir de los resulta-dos en Matemáticas de PISA 2012. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3tH8Kh7
  • Kim, K.-J., & Frick, T. W. (2011). Changes in student motivation during online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 1-2 3 .
  • Kowalski, S. E., Kowalski, F. V., & Gardner, T. Q. (2009). Lessons learned when gathering real-time for-mative assessment in the university classroom using tablet PCs. In 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1-5.
  • Kraut, R. (Ed.). (2013). Policy guidelines for mobile learning. Unesco.
  • Lai, F., Luo, R., Zhang, L., Huang, X. & Rozelle, S. (2015). Does computer-assisted learning improve lear-ning outcomes? Evidence from a randomized experiment in migrant schools in Beijing. Economics of Education Review, 47, 34-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.03.005
  • Lee, J., Lin, L., & Robertson, T. (2012). The impact of media multitasking on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 37, 94 -104. ht tp://doi:10.1080/17439884. 2010. 53766 4
  • Mateo, J. (2000). La investigación educativa, su práctica y otras metáforas. Barcelona, España: ICE-UB/Horsori.
  • Meyer, B. (2016). Mobile devices and spatial enactments of learning: IPads in lower secondary schools. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile Learning, 3-10. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3aw28dV
  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.h t t p s : //d o i :10 .1111/ j .14 6 7- 9 6 2 0 . 2 0 0 6 . 0 0 6 8 4 . x .
  • Moreira, F., Ferreira, M. J., Santos, C. P., & Durão, N. (2017). Evolution and use of mobile devices in hig-her education: A case study in Portuguese higher education institutions between 2009/2010 and 2014/2015. Telematics and Informatics, 34 (6), 838-852. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.tele.2016.08.010
  • Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological science, 25( 6 ) , 115 9 -116 8 .
  • Nguyen, L., Barton, S. M., & Nguyen, L. T. (2015). iPads in higher education-Hype and hope. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 190-203. http://doi:10.1111/bjet.12137
  • OECD (2015), Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en
  • Saccol, A., Barbosa, J. I. V., Schlemmer, E., & Rienhard, N. (2010). Corporate m-learning: applications and challenges. In Guy (Ed.) Mobile Learning: Pilot Projects and Initiatives (pp. 215-242). California, USA: Information Science Press.
  • Sandín, M. P. (2003). Investigación cualitativa en educación. Fundamentos y tradiciones. Madrid, España: McGraw Hill.
  • Seif, J. (2019). Mobile Technologies and Mobile Learning: How has the use of tablets innovated learning within Secondary School classrooms? Technology and the Curriculum: Summer 2019. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3tDpVAk
  • Sha, L., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., Seow, P., & Wong, L. H. (2012). Recognizing and measuring self-regulated learning in a mobile learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 718-728.
  • Suárez-Guerrero, C., Lloret-Catalá, C., & Mengual-Andrés, S. (2016). Percepción docente sobre la trans-formación digital del aula a través de tabletas: un estudio en el contexto español. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 24(49), 81-89.
  • Torrecillas-Lacave, T., Vázquez-Barrio, T., & Monteagudo-Barandalla, L. (2017). Percepción de los padres sobre el empoderamiento digital de las familias en hogares hiperconectados. El profesional de la información (EPI), 26(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.ene.10
  • West, M. (2012). Activando el aprendizaje móvil: Temas globales. Serie de documentos de trabajo de la UNESCO sobre el aprendizaje móvil. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/3tHxWnM
  • Wheeler, S., Waite, S. & Bromfield, C. (2002). Promoting creative thinking through the use of ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18( 3 ) , 3 6 7.
  • Yáñez-Luna, J. & Arias-Oliva, M. (2018). M-learning: aceptación tecnológica de dispositivos móviles en la formación online. Tecnología, ciencia y educación, 10, 13 -3 4 .
Data source: Dialnet